From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: void variable
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:08:03 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1ByGcF-0005Op-AN@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <410353ED.1090107@math.ku.dk> <4104091E.4040007@math.ku.dk>
	<200407252046.i6PKkFH29813@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<jwv1xiya875.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<200407262041.i6QKfFu15523@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<E1Bpqqq-0004cL-MZ@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwv8ycbdixm.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1093036171 30282 80.91.224.253 (20 Aug 2004 21:09:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:09:31 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: larsh@math.ku.dk, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 20 23:09:19 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ByGdT-0003VH-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:09:19 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1ByGhn-0004Bt-GQ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:13:47 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1ByGh8-0003lb-B3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:13:06 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1ByGh6-0003kn-Qs
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:13:06 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1ByGh6-0003kk-Ot
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:13:04 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ByGcG-0000yf-Cn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:08:04 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1ByGcF-0005Op-AN; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:08:03 -0400
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <jwv8ycbdixm.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on 19 Aug 2004 15:33:53 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26354
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26354

    The patch below seems to work well.  Any objection (or suggestion of
    a better message)?

It has to say what operation is reporting this message.
Otherwise nobody will understand why they would have expected
it to be otherwise.

So it could be:

   "defvar for %s did not work properly because it was locally bound"