From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Single process output reading Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:49:58 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <874qn35tgf.fsf@zamazal.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1092977432 19758 80.91.224.253 (20 Aug 2004 04:50:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pdm@brailcom.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 20 06:50:27 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1By1MB-0003Gc-00 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 06:50:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1By1QT-0000wl-Ic for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:54:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1By1QH-0000ui-HL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:54:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1By1QG-0000u3-6O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:54:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1By1QG-0000tm-1T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:54:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1By1Li-0002pH-Fu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:49:58 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1By1Li-00039Y-3i; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:49:58 -0400 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26337 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26337 Should I rename wait_reading_process_input to wait_reading_process_output ? Indeed, it would be better to make the code consistent in regard to whether we call this "input" or "output" ;-).