From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MH-E 7.4.4 checked in Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:17:00 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <1890.1089689203@newt.com> <2914-Tue13Jul2004070451+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <3589.1089692661@newt.com> <2914-Tue13Jul2004215551+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <861xjfkpgu.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1089897508 32392 80.91.224.253 (15 Jul 2004 13:18:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 15 15:18:24 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bl680-0005C1-00 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:18:24 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bl67z-0005ZD-00 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:18:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bl6AT-00005c-8S for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:20:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bl69O-0007yL-Ka for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:19:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bl69N-0007xY-5P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:19:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bl69M-0007wZ-W1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:19:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bl66m-0000Q0-Sw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:17:08 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Bl66e-0002uA-Fo; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:17:00 -0400 Original-To: Kai Grossjohann In-reply-to: <861xjfkpgu.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> (message from Kai Grossjohann on Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:38:57 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25719 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25719 So usually the ChangeLog in the Tramp repository might have many entries between two releases, whereas the Emacs repository typically just has two entries for each release (one for Michael's changes and one for my own changes). The ChangeLog entries in the Emacs repository summarize the Tramp entries in such a way that, for example, changes made and then reverted are not described (since the intermediate version never showed up in the Emacs repository). What do people think about this? This is the ideal method.