From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.multi-tty,gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Emacs routinely gets stuck in single_kboard mode
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:57:14 -0400
Sender: multi-tty-bounces@lists.fnord.hu
Message-ID: <E1BkAfa-0000id-RB@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <lorentey.g.e.devel.8765a3x13i.elte@eris.elte.hu>
	<E1BZcqu-0008R0-JK@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<lorentey.l.multi-tty.87658v2uwi.elte@eris.elte.hu>
	<E1BjnfV-0008Np-Pz@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<lorentey.l.multi-tty.87pt71hhp4.elte@eris.elte.hu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1089676669 15782 80.91.224.253 (12 Jul 2004 23:57:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:57:49 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: multi-tty@lists.fnord.hu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: multi-tty-bounces@lists.fnord.hu Tue Jul 13 01:57:40 2004
Return-path: <multi-tty-bounces@lists.fnord.hu>
Original-Received: from ninsei.hu ([212.92.23.158] helo=chatsubo.ninsei.hu)
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BkAfw-00005L-00
	for <gem-multi-tty@m.gmane.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 01:57:40 +0200
Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (nixon [127.0.0.1])
	by chatsubo.ninsei.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117B21AC8F;
	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 01:57:29 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [199.232.76.164])
	by chatsubo.ninsei.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BDA1AC8D
	for <multi-tty@lists.fnord.hu>; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 01:57:25 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BkAfa-0000id-RB; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:57:14 -0400
Original-To: lorentey@elte.hu (=?iso-8859-2?Q?L=F5rentey_K=E1roly?=)
In-reply-to: <lorentey.l.multi-tty.87pt71hhp4.elte@eris.elte.hu>
X-BeenThere: multi-tty@lists.fnord.hu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of multiple tty support in Emacs
	<multi-tty.lists.fnord.hu>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.fnord.hu/mailman/listinfo/multi-tty>,
	<mailto:multi-tty-request@lists.fnord.hu?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.fnord.hu/pipermail/multi-tty>
List-Post: <mailto:multi-tty@lists.fnord.hu>
List-Help: <mailto:multi-tty-request@lists.fnord.hu?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.fnord.hu/mailman/listinfo/multi-tty>,
	<mailto:multi-tty-request@lists.fnord.hu?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: multi-tty-bounces@lists.fnord.hu
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.multi-tty:24 gmane.emacs.devel:25631
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25631

    > Sorry, I don't follow what you're saying here.
    > The other terminals won't see the buffer that the recursive
    > edit or debug session is in, and there is potential
    > for a lot of confusion.

    I agree, but I think locking up the other displays leads to even more
    problems.

Maybe it should display something saying "Locked by another keyboard"
in all the windows for other keyboards.  That way, the person at that
keyboard will understand why it is locked.

You seem to be envisioning that there is only one user, who uses
the various different keyboards.  I've always thought in terms of
a different user at each keyboard.  Perhaps this is why we have
different ideas of what would be desirable.