From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: ECB
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:18:19 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1Bii9j-0001UU-De@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <BCA1A6F5CBABD44388AB9C4C6D0D13660260F8F7@mucexch3.muc.sdm.de>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1089328741 29692 80.91.224.253 (8 Jul 2004 23:19:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:19:01 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 09 01:18:54 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BiiAI-0006UT-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 01:18:54 +0200
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BiiAI-0003Hn-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 01:18:54 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BiiCR-0002JI-6X
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:21:07 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BiiC3-0002BM-DP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:20:43 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BiiC2-0002Aq-E8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:20:42 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BiiC2-0002Ag-9J
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:20:42 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bii9k-0003VF-5n
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:18:20 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Bii9j-0001UU-De; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:18:19 -0400
Original-To: "Berndl, Klaus" <klaus.berndl@sdm.de>
In-reply-to: <BCA1A6F5CBABD44388AB9C4C6D0D13660260F8F7@mucexch3.muc.sdm.de>
	(klaus.berndl@sdm.de)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25548
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25548

    But IMO it would make sense to offer both ECB and speedbar so a user can
    deside for himself which interface he likes more...

Could ECB implement both interfaces, so that the user use ECB
and still decide for himself which interface he likes more?