From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ECB Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:59:56 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <40E5A52D.2000104@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1089151260 3680 80.91.224.253 (6 Jul 2004 22:01:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 22:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 07 00:00:27 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BhxzG-0003mu-00 for ; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 00:00:26 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BhxzF-0002c8-00 for ; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 00:00:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bhy1I-0001uS-3s for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 18:02:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bhy11-0001u4-JZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 18:02:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bhy10-0001tg-PV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 18:02:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bhy10-0001tZ-M4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 18:02:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bhxyq-0005QQ-8c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 18:00:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Bhxym-0006sd-7c; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:59:56 -0400 Original-To: Jason Rumney In-reply-to: (message from Jason Rumney on Tue, 06 Jul 2004 08:41:55 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25504 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25504 > I thought (from other posts) that ECB essentially _contained_ speedbar, > though probably an updated version -- so it seems like there would be > little pain in moving to ECB from that perspective. It can contain (physically on the screen, not as part of the Lisp package) speedbar, but that is an option. It also uses speedbar functionality to support modes that are not supported by semantic. So, does this mean that ECB makes the existing Speebar package obsolete? If not, then why not?