From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Improving emacs process performance (for free?)
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 13:03:11 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1BU7El-0006ml-Pk@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3iseihohi.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085850327 10739 80.91.224.253 (29 May 2004 17:05:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 17:05:27 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat May 29 19:05:22 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BU7Gs-0007Ii-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Sat, 29 May 2004 19:05:22 +0200
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BU7Gs-0002JU-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 29 May 2004 19:05:22 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BU7Gy-0007tY-3v
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 13:05:28 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BU7Go-0007re-Me
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 13:05:18 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BU7Gn-0007qo-0a
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 13:05:17 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BU7Gm-0007qa-Rr
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 13:05:16 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BU7Em-0001uX-Ea
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 13:03:12 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BU7El-0006ml-Pk; Sat, 29 May 2004 13:03:11 -0400
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m3iseihohi.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24179
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24179

    The buffer is allocated on the stack (with alloca), so it could be a
    problem on systems with limited stack size -- do we still have such
    systems?

I don't think so.