From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never). Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 23:50:57 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87eks0654s.fsf@sno.mundell.ukfsn.org> <87n06bp4ng.fsf@sno.mundell.ukfsn.org> <8765cwkejr.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <200404071157.UAA25094@etlken.m17n.org> <200404071312.WAA25268@etlken.m17n.org> <87zn9nqras.fsf@emacswiki.org> <87hdvux5uz.fsf@orebokech.com> <87lll6v514.fsf@orebokech.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1081742378 26534 80.91.224.253 (12 Apr 2004 03:59:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: romain@orebokech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 12 05:59:26 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BCsbW-0003DU-00 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 05:59:26 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BCsbV-0008GA-00 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 05:59:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BCrXM-00077p-Qs for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 22:51:04 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BCrXH-00077F-EJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 22:50:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BCrXG-00076b-8H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 22:50:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BCrXG-00076U-10 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 22:50:58 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24) id 1BCsTJ-0007Ti-Cy; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 23:50:57 -0400 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:21495 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:21495 I still think this is a bad idea -- it cannot be done without potentially destabilizing the trunk which is currently in a very stable state, and thus in a pretty unique state of "readiness for release". We could urge all the pretesters to try out the unicode branch now. That way we would get a picture of how far it is from readiness.