From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Unsafe file variables...
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 12:25:20 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1BAAQy-0003Tv-3R@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <x5lllckhk4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1081096280 5932 80.91.224.253 (4 Apr 2004 16:31:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 16:31:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 04 18:31:16 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BAAWi-0004rN-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 18:31:16 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BAAWh-00070r-01
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 18:31:16 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1BAAW7-0001yx-Tb
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 12:30:39 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30)
	id 1BAAVs-0001u2-1S
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 12:30:24 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30)
	id 1BAAR5-0008AZ-Nr
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 12:25:59 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BAAR3-00089Y-9k
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 12:25:25 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24)
	id 1BAAQy-0003Tv-3R; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 12:25:20 -0400
Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <x5lllckhk4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on 03
	Apr 2004 21:06:03 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:21241
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:21241

    Something like that.  I would then customize a variable that tells
    whose signatures I trust enough not to get the stupid question again
    and again.

    Obviously, this also makes it possible for me to look at the local
    variable block once, decide that it is good enough for me, and sign
    it.

It looks good to me, but it would be good to get comments
from security experts.