From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What shall we do to verify the CVS diffs for emacs? Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 21:32:25 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200401142008.i0EK8OUI007731@sun1.aic.nrl.navy.mil> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1074199176 16406 80.91.224.253 (15 Jan 2004 20:39:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:39:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Hoey@aic.nrl.navy.mil, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 15 21:39:30 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AhEH3-00019N-00 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 21:39:29 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AhEH3-0000o1-00 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 21:39:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AhE3T-0003RF-C1 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:25:27 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AhE33-0003QD-6v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:25:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AhE2I-0003GM-Sn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:24:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.24) id 1AhE1h-00037u-Kn; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:23:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [151.38.242.62] (helo=surf.glug.org) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AhE0W-0000ma-Tm; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:22:25 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by surf.glug.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AhEAD-0006Fn-00; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 21:32:25 +0100 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: (message from David Kastrup on 15 Jan 2004 19:47:17 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:19183 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:19183 From: David Kastrup Date: 15 Jan 2004 19:47:17 +0100 Oh, come on. Stop everybody crying "sacrilege". ??? The question is quite relevant, even though we might not like its current answer. it's relevancy is not under debate. i'm just curious what concrete action will come of it (particularly as initiated and enacted by the OP), besides all this talk, entertaining as it may or may not be. if you feel defensive then please just try to relax -- i'm not asking you, specifically, or even "you" generally. There is nothing wrong in trying to assess the current situation by asking on the developers' list. Where else would you go for that? is there something wrong w/ asking questions about asking questions? how is one form of assessing the situation contra-indicated whereas the other is not? thi