From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:36:46 -0500
Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1AflOA-0006KN-0O@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200401051824.i05IOpP07535@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<rzqfzet6tb3.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk>
	<E1AeFFR-0000VT-6H@fencepost.gnu.org> <rzqhdz5w5iz.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1073850095 12793 80.91.224.253 (11 Jan 2004 19:41:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:41:35 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 11 20:41:31 2004
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AflSl-0004pE-00
	for <geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:41:31 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AfmPp-00018d-CL
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:42:33 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AfmND-0008Mw-D6
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:39:51 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AfmMT-00080x-GX
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:39:36 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AfmMR-0007zO-RZ
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:39:03 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AflOA-0006KN-0O; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:36:46 -0500
Original-To: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>
In-reply-to: <rzqhdz5w5iz.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk> (message from Dave Love on Fri, 
	09 Jan 2004 14:39:00 +0000)
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
	<bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:6531
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:6531

    > It would not be consistent to call a symbol whose names is ...-hook
    > as a function.

    Yes, as I said, but I believe you approved it.

I believe I approved running that symbol as a normal hook.
That is how it should work.  The incorrect usage of defining
this symbol as a function never worked.  We should just fix the
incorrect usage.