From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org
Subject: Re: locate-library INTERACTIVE-CALL argument
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 09:04:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E19kNxp-0004rV-Dt@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F303145.9060905@yahoo.com> (message from Kevin Rodgers on Tue, 05 Aug 2003 16:35:49 -0600)
> Perhaps there ought to be a way to use interactive-p to get
> such a result. It could be a good feature.
Do you mean adding an &optional KEYBOARD-MACROS-TOO argument, so it
would return non-nil even when called while executing a keyboard macro?
Or do you mean distinguishing different non-nil return values, e.g.
call-interactively vs. execute-kbd-macro (instead of just t)?
I was thinking of the former, but the latter might be a good idea.
Or do you mean distinguishing different non-nil return values, e.g.
call-interactively vs. execute-kbd-macro (instead of just t)?
> But there may be a better feature. Ever since 1985 I had the idea
> that maybe (interactive...) could be extended with a second argument
> saying how to display the value. That would be complimentary with the
> existing arg saying how to provide the arguments. That might be the
> really clean way to do this job.
I don't know what you mean. (interactive ...) returns a list of values,
which are mapped to the lambda list symbols.
The `interactive' form, when evaluated, returns nil.
However, it holds one "argument", a form that can be evaluated
to produce a list of argument values. It could hold additional
"arguments" which could be used for various purposes,
including to display the command's return value.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-06 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-31 17:00 locate-library INTERACTIVE-CALL argument Kevin Rodgers
2003-08-02 4:47 ` Richard Stallman
[not found] ` <mailman.11.1059814578.2377.bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2003-08-04 16:10 ` Kevin Rodgers
2003-08-05 19:14 ` Richard Stallman
[not found] ` <mailman.112.1060111669.29551.bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2003-08-05 22:35 ` Kevin Rodgers
2003-08-06 13:04 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E19kNxp-0004rV-Dt@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.