From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Files in wrong subdirs of emacs/lisp?
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 04:33:53 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E19IlWL-0006ww-EN@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20030520130413.8A2E.JMBARRANQUERO@laley.wke.es>
	<m19ISlE-000IeGC@rattlesnake.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1053594479 9036 80.91.224.249 (22 May 2003 09:07:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 09:07:59 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu May 22 11:07:56 2003
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19Im3I-0002LN-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Thu, 22 May 2003 11:07:56 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 19ImEU-00022o-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Thu, 22 May 2003 11:19:30 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 19Im1O-0006xH-Qi
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 05:05:58 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20)
	id 19IllO-0003oL-IH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 04:49:26 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20)
	id 19Ila6-0000JC-GF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 04:37:57 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 19IlWL-0007QC-LG
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 04:33:53 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.20)
	id 19IlWL-0006ww-EN; Thu, 22 May 2003 04:33:53 -0400
Original-To: bob@rattlesnake.com
In-reply-to: <m19ISlE-000IeGC@rattlesnake.com> (bob@rattlesnake.com)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14083
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14083

    My understanding is that some of the currently popular small devices
    do not support floating point.  I do not know for sure, but if true,
    then potentially, millions of people could use such an Emacs.

Nowadays GCC provides emulated floating point even if the machine
does not support it.