From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: [gerd.moellmann@t-online.de: Re: [Don Saklad ] How to correct or bypass an error. Control-u f rmail in emacs onfencepost] Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 11:23:00 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051975436 1565 80.91.224.249 (3 May 2003 15:23:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 15:23:56 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat May 03 17:23:55 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19Byrj-0000P3-00 for ; Sat, 03 May 2003 17:23:55 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19Byto-0001Ut-00 for ; Sat, 03 May 2003 17:26:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19ByrZ-0001w4-07 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 03 May 2003 11:23:45 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19Byr2-0001Fl-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 May 2003 11:23:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19Byqt-0000nt-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 May 2003 11:23:06 -0400 Original-Received: from colo.agora-net.com ([207.245.84.69]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19Byqs-0000dg-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 May 2003 11:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by colo.agora-net.com with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 19Byqq-0002KO-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 May 2003 11:23:00 -0400 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:13652 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:13652 could a sendmail expert comment on whether or not unconditional "-t" in mail/sendmail.el `sendmail-send-it' in the presence of Resent-* headers is appropriate? my gut feeling is that this change was intended as temporary, since the code is still there, just commented out. Gerd does not remember the details. background: the reported misbehavior is that `C-u f' in rmail on fencepost results in the MTA signalling error (it does not accept "Resent-*" headers when using "-t"). thi ------- Start of forwarded message ------- From: gerd.moellmann@t-online.de (Gerd Moellmann) Subject: Re: [Don Saklad ] How to correct or bypass an error. Control-u f rmail in emacs on fencepost Date: 03 May 2003 16:51:11 +0200 Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > i notice a 2001-03-21 change in emacs/mail/sendmail.el: > > * mail/sendmail.el (sendmail-send-it): Don't parse Resent-* > headers. Always invoke sendmail with option -t. > > that seems to trigger the problem described below. was this change > supposed to be temporary? I'm sorry, but I don't remember a bit of this. Maybe some on emacs-devel remembers. ------- End of forwarded message -------