From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, xemacs-design@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Rationale for split-string?
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 21:00:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1988ct-0003m8-00@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ist8yv4n.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (stephen@xemacs.org)
So I suppose you want a simpler version of Luc Teirlinck's
suggestion. How about:
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;
;; one function, three arguments
(defun split-string (string &optional separators omit-nulls)
"Splits STRING into substrings bounded by matches for SEPARATORS.
The beginning and end of STRING, and each match for SEPARATORS, are
splitting points. The substrings between the splitting points are
collected in a list, which is returned. (The substrings matching
SEPARATORS are removed.)
If SEPARATORS is nil, it defaults to \"[ \f\t\n\r\v]+\".
If OMIT-NULLs is t, zero-length substrings are omitted from the list
(so that for the default value of SEPARATORS leading and trailing
whitespace are trimmed). If nil, all zero-length substrings are
retained, which correctly parses CSV format, for example."
That seems like the right thing, except I think that if SEPARATORS is
nil, OMIT-NULLS should default to t.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-23 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-17 9:06 Rationale for split-string? Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-04-17 11:30 ` Stefan Reichör
2003-04-18 1:54 ` Richard Stallman
2003-04-18 2:59 ` Steve Youngs
2003-04-17 17:44 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-04-17 19:32 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-04-18 11:50 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-04-18 14:17 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-04-19 8:18 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-04-19 13:35 ` Richard Stallman
2003-04-19 4:14 ` Richard Stallman
2003-04-19 8:55 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-04-21 0:59 ` Richard Stallman
2003-04-21 1:55 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-04-21 10:58 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-04-21 21:11 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-04-21 23:43 ` Miles Bader
2003-04-22 3:26 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-04-22 4:09 ` Jerry James
2003-04-22 8:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-04-22 13:22 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-04-22 14:38 ` Jerry James
2003-04-22 12:56 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-04-22 14:56 ` Jerry James
2003-04-22 15:27 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-04-22 13:19 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-04-22 13:39 ` Miles Bader
2003-04-22 13:51 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-04-22 16:26 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-04-23 1:00 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2003-04-23 4:09 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-04-24 23:12 ` Richard Stallman
2003-05-20 1:55 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-05-22 15:00 ` Kai Großjohann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-20 3:11 Bill Wohler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1988ct-0003m8-00@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=xemacs-design@xemacs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.