From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BUG: which-func-mode Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 23:51:45 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200303101828.h2AISIrs027316@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200303111907.h2BJ7ZHv012258@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200303142346.h2ENkKWm025313@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200303160802.h2G827JU003097@rum.cs.yale.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1047876860 9474 80.91.224.249 (17 Mar 2003 04:54:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 04:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 17 05:54:18 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18umde-0002SX-00 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 05:54:18 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18un39-0000Ip-00 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 06:20:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18umbz-0008GE-02 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 23:52:35 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18umbS-00083S-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 23:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18umbL-0007rA-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 23:51:56 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18umbC-0007Ua-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 23:51:46 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 18umbB-0003sD-00; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 23:51:45 -0500 Original-To: "Stefan Monnier" In-reply-to: <200303160802.h2G827JU003097@rum.cs.yale.edu> (monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu) Original-cc: lewang@yahoo.com Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:12395 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:12395 > Because it changes the selected buffer. I don't understand why one should imply the other. After all, `set-buffer' also changes the selected buffer but it doesn't modify the buffer-list. set-buffer only changes the current buffer; it doesn't change the selected buffer, which is the buffer that is displayed in the selected window.