From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Can we add a check to see if user is using old or obsolete
 code?
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:38:14 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E18nLcM-0002ZJ-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <5xfzqibr72.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
	<84n0kq7ia3.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de>
	<84k7fr8dei.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1046105071 29542 80.91.224.249 (24 Feb 2003 16:44:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:44:31 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18nLiO-0007gF-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:44:28 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18nLxv-00072T-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:00:31 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18nLef-0002ga-01
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:40:37 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18nLdR-0001oZ-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:39:21 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18nLco-0001EE-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:38:43 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18nLcM-00015V-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:38:14 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18nLcM-0002ZJ-00; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:38:14 -0500
Original-To: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai
	=?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
In-reply-to: <84k7fr8dei.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de>
	(kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11920
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11920

    I'm not sufficiently acquainted with the Makefiles.  But it seems to
    me that "make all" from the top-level directory first does "make all"
    in the src subdir, and that does the shadowing check.  (Or is it
    "make bootstrap"?)  After that, it proceeds to do the lisp subdir,
    and leim.

`make all' doesn't do `lisp', but it does do `leim' after `src'.

    So how about having the toplevel Makefile do all the subdirs first
    (src, lisp, leim), and then, at the end, do the shadowing check?

We could move the shadow-check code into `make all' directly.

Then `make emacs' in `src'would not do it.  Does anyone think that is
a problem?