From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: List of possible coding systems
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:25:40 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E18iiqS-000842-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200302102220.h1AMKNE23788@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045003847 9136 80.91.224.249 (11 Feb 2003 22:50:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 22:50:47 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18ijE8-0002Lp-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 23:50:08 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18ijPp-0007nk-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 00:02:13 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18ijDA-0003lp-06
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:49:08 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18ijBu-0002gb-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:47:50 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18ijBo-0002QZ-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:47:46 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18ij9p-0001YX-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:45:41 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18iiqS-000842-00; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:25:40 -0500
Original-To: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu>
In-reply-to: <200302102220.h1AMKNE23788@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	(monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11570
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11570

    How about the change below ?
    It removes `raw-text', `emacs-mule', and `no-conversion' from the
    list of possible coding-systems to choose from (when prompting
    the user during file-save) unless nothing else can be used.

I have no objections in principle.  What does Handa think?