From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ?\_ patch Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:25:23 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200302060044.SAA21429@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200302060106.TAA21443@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <5xel6lu3lh.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5xadh9tyt3.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5x1y2ge1tl.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045003984 9854 80.91.224.249 (11 Feb 2003 22:53:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 22:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: miles@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18ijGt-0002YH-00 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 23:52:59 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18ijSa-0007pt-00 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 00:05:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18ijDS-0003nH-00 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:49:26 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18ijBR-000295-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:47:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18ijBN-00023u-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:47:18 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18ij9p-0001YX-01 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:45:41 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 18iiqB-000828-00; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:25:23 -0500 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-reply-to: <5x1y2ge1tl.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (storm@cua.dk) Original-cc: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu Original-cc: ted@oconnor.cx Original-cc: handa@m17n.org Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11571 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11571 > This might be a good idea if we combine it with the feature that it is > an error to put a digit or a symbol character or # after a character > constant with no space in between. There are several places where something like '(? ?...) or '(?\ ?...) is used, i.e. where no additional space separates the "? " character from the "?" of the next character. Looking closely, there is no overlap between these cases and the ones I said should be an error.