From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: info Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 10:41:53 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200302010122.TAA12524@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200302031440.h13EeTR11294@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200302031900.NAA27632@moose.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044374296 20646 80.91.224.249 (4 Feb 2003 15:58:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 15:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18g5Rx-0005JL-00 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 16:57:29 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18g5a6-00067p-00 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 17:05:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18g5T0-0007Ee-03 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 10:58:34 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18g5Kj-0003yF-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 10:50:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18g5HH-0002XH-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 10:46:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18g5Cr-0000QR-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 10:41:53 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 18g5Cr-0007l4-00; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 10:41:53 -0500 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200302031900.NAA27632@moose.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:00:07 -0600 (CST)) Original-cc: eliz@is.elta.co.il Original-cc: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11344 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11344 Not an actual example, but an example I gave before with some newlines removed. Everything depends on the likelihood of such examples occurring on practice. Especially the missing newline before the "Footnotes" line (the only problem) looks ugly to me. I agree, and I would say that is bad Texinfo style. It is possible that the Texinfo manual says so. It is also possible that Makeinfo will put blank lines there, but I am not sure. We should fix any such manuals.