From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: info Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:20:14 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200301301621.KAA08744@eel.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044041193 23354 80.91.224.249 (31 Jan 2003 19:26:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 19:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18ego3-00064P-00 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 20:26:31 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18eguK-0003BP-00 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 20:33:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18egmM-00087B-00 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:24:46 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18eglp-0007zY-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:24:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18egiO-0006nk-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:20:41 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18egi4-0006Kh-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:20:20 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 18eghy-0000PR-00; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:20:14 -0500 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200301301621.KAA08744@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:21:39 -0600 (CST)) Original-cc: eliz@is.elta.co.il Original-cc: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11258 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11258 In this case, it would be good for RET to get an error. Probably it should take a single menu item to consist of the * line followed by all successive indented lines, including blank lines when further indented lines follow but excluding blank lines that would be at the end of the menu item. Problems occur in situations like: * Sample .emacs File:: --- Indices --- * Concept Index:: I see the problem, but don't worry about it too much. It doesn't have to be perfect, just better. It would be better to make occasional rare mistakes like this than to fail frequently on multi-line menu items.