From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: `delete-frame-hook' isn't defined
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:07:58 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E17wanm-00021u-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E17v8sT-0003w0-00@bundalo.shootybangbang.com> <E17vj3N-00030W-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <E17w27b-0002Vj-00@bundalo.shootybangbang.com> <E17wGMm-0006nW-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <E17wOjJ-0003eO-00@bundalo.shootybangbang.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033532017 6132 127.0.0.1 (2 Oct 2002 04:13:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 04:13:37 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17watD-0001ak-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 06:13:35 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17wbdh-0004Qc-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 07:01:37 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17watW-0006be-00; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:13:54 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17wano-0005i6-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:08:00 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17wanm-0005hu-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:07:59 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17wanm-0005ho-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:07:58 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 17wanm-00021u-00; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:07:58 -0400
Original-To: jpw@shootybangbang.com
In-reply-to: <E17wOjJ-0003eO-00@bundalo.shootybangbang.com> (message from John
	Paul Wallington on Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:14:33 +0100)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8319
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8319

    That sounds good.  Is it okay to change `delete-frame-hook' to a
    standard hook where the frame to be deleted is made the selected frame?

I think it is cleaner to leave the calling convention unchanged.