From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: XPM images
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:20:31 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E17v89f-00036z-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3it0to4zi.fsf@ID-87814.user.dfncis.de>
	<E17ugRj-0005ES-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <m3wup8co3b.fsf@ID-87814.user.dfncis.de>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033184077 13658 127.0.0.1 (28 Sep 2002 03:34:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 03:34:37 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17v8NI-0003YA-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 05:34:36 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17v95o-0007ed-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 06:20:36 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17v8NT-000502-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:34:47 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17v89r-0003LK-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:20:43 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17v89g-0003L0-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:20:42 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17v89f-0003Ku-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:20:31 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 17v89f-00036z-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:20:31 -0400
Original-To: alkibiades@gmx.de
In-reply-to: <m3wup8co3b.fsf@ID-87814.user.dfncis.de> (message from Oliver
	Scholz on Fri, 27 Sep 2002 01:45:12 +0200)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8214
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8214

    Not necessarily. It depends on the chosen solution. The decision
    between splash.pbm and splash.xpm is made in startup.el, based on
    functions provided by image.el. So if I go on and hook the
    Lisp-conversion into images.el (I guess that would be `create-image'),
    it _could_ affect the choice of the image. Of course, I could also
    make sure in startup.el that this does not happen.

It would be important to do that.