From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: A few questions about occur-mode
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 20:16:31 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E17tGtr-0006KQ-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20020920131146.369D.LEKTU@terra.es> <E17sq6M-00032D-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <20020922142753.B387.LEKTU@terra.es>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1032740315 11799 127.0.0.1 (23 Sep 2002 00:18:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 00:18:35 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17tGvq-00034B-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 02:18:34 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17tHbr-0006SB-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 03:02:00 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17tGvo-0001Kv-00; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 20:18:32 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17tGtt-0001GC-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 20:16:33 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17tGtr-0001G0-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 20:16:32 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17tGtr-0001Fu-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 20:16:31 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 17tGtr-0006KQ-00; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 20:16:31 -0400
Original-To: lektu@terra.es
In-reply-to: <20020922142753.B387.LEKTU@terra.es> (message from Juanma
	Barranquero on Sun, 22 Sep 2002 14:32:35 -0300)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8104
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8104

    Wouldnīt then be logical to rename them? AFAIK, user functions for a
    mode FOO are usually FOO-func1, FOO-func2, not FOO-mode-func1,
    FOO-mode-func2. I donīt think changing them would cause trouble, as
    users are probably using them throug bindings in occur-mode and not
    directly with M-x.

Yes, that renaming is ok if you want to do it.