From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: \201 back again
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 15:39:08 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E17sq5s-0002yx-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <sh3csmjhsd.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de>
	<7458-Fri20Sep2002192255+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <shhegkzj68.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de> <3028-Sat21Sep2002005404+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1032637408 27601 127.0.0.1 (21 Sep 2002 19:43:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 19:43:28 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: keichwa@gmx.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17sqA3-0007B3-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 21:43:27 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17sqpV-0006BQ-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 22:26:17 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17sqA2-00006A-00; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 15:43:26 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17sq5v-0008IN-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 15:39:11 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17sq5t-0008Hi-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 15:39:11 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17sq5t-0008Hb-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 15:39:09 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 17sq5s-0002yx-00; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 15:39:08 -0400
Original-To: eliz@is.elta.co.il
In-reply-to: <3028-Sat21Sep2002005404+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8082
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8082

    As for the encoding, it says this:

       Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

    So the question now is how come Richard's Emacs sent such a badly
    encoded message, and why did it think it was in UTF-8 when in fact it
    was in emacs-mule?

I don't know where the Content-Type field came from, but certainly not
from Emacs.  sendmail.el doesn't know about them.

As for the strangeness of the encoding, I think that is coming from
the Emacs on fencepost that I am using to finally send my mail.
I should build the latest Emacs and use that instead.