From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: problem with mh-e and 2002-08-20 change to font-core.el
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 19:33:16 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E17kCJI-0000zH-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200208260738.g7Q7c8S23362@localhost.localdomain> <200208262151.g7QLpN812743@wijiji.santafe.edu> <200208262209.g7QM9cx26500@rum.cs.yale.edu>  <200208280653.g7S6r4p13393@wijiji.santafe.edu> <200208281355.g7SDtUl03773@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030578784 24366 127.0.0.1 (28 Aug 2002 23:53:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 23:53:04 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, y@mit.edu,
	mh-e-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17kCcO-0006Kj-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 01:53:00 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17kD8Q-0002Xa-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 02:26:06 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17kCdm-0002gQ-00; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 19:54:26 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17kCJN-0000vY-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 19:33:21 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17kCJI-0000v7-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 19:33:18 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17kCJI-0000uz-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 19:33:16 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 17kCJI-0000zH-00; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 19:33:16 -0400
Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu
In-Reply-To: <200208281355.g7SDtUl03773@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	(monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7089
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7089

    > That would not do the job; it would fail to remove all the properties
    > which the current code removes.

    Can you give examples ?

Modes that use font-lock-face are an example.  The current code
removes that property; just turning off font-lock-mode would not
remove it.

font-lock-face properties go in mode-specific places.

    PS: And the current code fails to remove those properties if you didn't
	turn font-lock-mode ON, which doesn't make much sense either.

Sorry, I don't understand.  Would you say that more clearly?