From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Francesco Potorti` Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No calc in pretest? Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 01:23:01 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200207052314.g65NEI829912@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025911431 17466 127.0.0.1 (5 Jul 2002 23:23:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 23:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, burton@openprivacy.org, eliz@is.elta.co.il, storm@cua.dk, miles@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17QcQZ-0004Xb-00 for ; Sat, 06 Jul 2002 01:23:51 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17QcXG-0004bd-00 for ; Sat, 06 Jul 2002 01:30:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17QcQn-0007Nk-00; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 19:24:05 -0400 Original-Received: from pot.cnuce.cnr.it ([146.48.83.182]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17QcQC-0007MX-00; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 19:23:28 -0400 Original-Received: from pot by pot.cnuce.cnr.it with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17QcPl-0002wo-00; Sat, 06 Jul 2002 01:23:01 +0200 Original-To: Jon Cast In-Reply-To: <200207052314.g65NEI829912@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu> (jcast@ou.edu) X-fingerprint: 4B2 6187 5C3 D6B1 2E31 7666 9DF 2DC9 BE21 6115 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5541 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5541 I think he means numbering bug-fix releases as 21.x.{2,3,...}. The bug-fix number is the `minor-minor' number. The first proposed numbering scheme was similar to this one, and in my opinion it was the wisest. Most software out there is released with a numbering resembling this, and its meaning is clearer than the current one.