From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question. Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:24:27 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87elev9y9o.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025130451 4536 127.0.0.1 (26 Jun 2002 22:27:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 22:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@is.elta.co.il, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17NLG7-0001B3-00 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:27:31 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17NLIQ-0004pv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:29:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17NLGG-0003c4-00; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:27:40 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17NLD9-0003Jz-00; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:24:27 -0400 Original-To: rlb@defaultvalue.org In-Reply-To: <87elev9y9o.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (message from Rob Browning on Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:24:51 -0500) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5220 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5220 So is this is a difference that's supposed to exist between the X and non-X versions? There is no need for them to be different, so we may as well make them the same. Can you figure out the cause of the remaining differences?