From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bytecomp warning for CL functions Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 19:32:18 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025048008 7733 127.0.0.1 (25 Jun 2002 23:33:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 23:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17MzoO-00020c-00 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 01:33:28 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17MzqE-0007Ls-00 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 01:35:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17MzoT-0000Aj-00; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 19:33:33 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17MznG-0008Pl-00; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 19:32:18 -0400 Original-To: d.love@dl.ac.uk In-Reply-To: (message from Dave Love on 24 Jun 2002 23:13:26 +0100) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5202 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5202 That is a good idea--Eli, would you please install it? I think it would be even better if these warnings were issued by default whenever the file does not include cl. Does anyone see a reason not to do that?