From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed? Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 16:34:56 -0700 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200205242114.g4OLE2T02822@aztec.santafe.edu> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1022283546 10619 127.0.0.1 (24 May 2002 23:39:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 23:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17BOeI-0002lA-00 for ; Sat, 25 May 2002 01:39:06 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17BOuO-0007ng-00 for ; Sat, 25 May 2002 01:55:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17BOeb-00071R-00; Fri, 24 May 2002 19:39:25 -0400 Original-Received: from ca-crlsbd-u5-c4a-a-172.crlsca.adelphia.net ([24.48.214.172] helo=giblet) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17BOe6-0006vO-00 for ; Fri, 24 May 2002 19:38:54 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17BOaG-0007cP-00 for ; Fri, 24 May 2002 16:34:56 -0700 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (message from Thien-Thi Nguyen on Fri, 24 May 2002 16:20:39 -0700) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4363 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4363 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 16:20:39 -0700 (IMHO, digging through spam-ridden mailing list archives is neither fun nor effective.) although it looks like the amount of spam varies wildly depending on the archive. emacs-devel seems to be quite clean, actually... thi