From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Francesco Potorti` Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [usability] mouse-1 for performing actions? Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 10:09:21 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <877klxyz25.fsf@pot.cnuce.cnr.it> <200205240042.g4O0gTR01075@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1022227924 31337 127.0.0.1 (24 May 2002 08:12:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 08:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, bob@rattlesnake.com Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17BABA-00089K-00 for ; Fri, 24 May 2002 10:12:04 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17BAQx-0003aO-00 for ; Fri, 24 May 2002 10:28:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17BABM-0002Ok-00; Fri, 24 May 2002 04:12:16 -0400 Original-Received: from pot.cnuce.cnr.it ([146.48.83.182]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17BA8a-0002JQ-00; Fri, 24 May 2002 04:09:24 -0400 Original-Received: from pot by pot.cnuce.cnr.it with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17BA8X-00087t-00; Fri, 24 May 2002 10:09:21 +0200 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200205240042.g4O0gTR01075@aztec.santafe.edu> (rms@gnu.org) X-fingerprint: 4B2 6187 5C3 D6B1 2E31 7666 9DF 2DC9 BE21 6115 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4326 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4326 Probably, Emacs should use the same conventions as the Gnome applications. Anyone knows if there is such a standard? There is a good argument for this. At the same time, it seems that the current Emacs mouse commands are superior. Perhaps GNOME should adapt its conventions to allow editors to work the way Emacs does. In order to do this, we need some GUI expert from the Gnome community to join this discussion, and possibly set up a small workgroup to work towards this end. I am saying this in order to give some ideas, but I personally don't know anyone who fits that description.