Re: Tree-sitter maturity

[Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>]

On December 29, 2024 1:54:57 AM EST, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 01:43:28AM -0500, Daniel Colascione wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On December 29, 2024 1:41:28 AM EST, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
>> >On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 11:21:10PM -0500, Daniel Colascione wrote:
>
>[including treesitter grammars in Emacs]
>
>> >> >But there are practical eeasons why we MIGHT not want to include those
>> >> >grammar files in Emacs at all.
>> >> >
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> Such as?
>> >
>> >More difficult to get rid of?
>> >
>> >Cheers
>> 
>> 
>> Can you elaborate?
>
>Sure. I observe that the whole treesitter culture is one far
>away from the Gnu culture. So I adopt a careful "wait and see"
>approach. I'll compile my Emacs without tree sitter support
>for as long as I don't understand the situation. Perhaps I'll
>want to avoid the whole thing forever, it depends.
>
>This will become the more and more difficult the more TS grammars
>start displacing regular Emacs grammars.
>
>Cheers

I'm honestly confused. Tree sitter grammars are free software. How are they "far away from GNU culture"? Is "Gnu culture" just doing what we were doing in 2010, but over and over again, forever?