From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pip Cet Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS: weak hash tables Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 15:57:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: <7PXYgVu5A8knQy6Q03cbm6FjO7s022nC0cqCRtUDhQBgA8ZrpLqmoVRgxD8moCTJpB_52ngFaJnW5JIflrzpHe09WcmbRqiHIdWQZE9kQgU=@protonmail.com> <87tth1xm4n.fsf@gmail.com> <87msmtxkpy.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16093"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Gerd_M=C3=B6llmann?= , Ihor Radchenko , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 07 18:04:21 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sQUN9-0003yp-3q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2024 18:04:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sQUMi-0005rb-5f; Sun, 07 Jul 2024 12:03:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sQUGw-00021O-Et for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2024 11:57:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-4316.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.16]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sQUGt-0002Bd-P6; Sun, 07 Jul 2024 11:57:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1720367869; x=1720627069; bh=yuLoE3KRjzEBduCc1QhrU/YFHKX4fbhZr5vHc+eQswQ=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=J645J7mYBVLfaFsB1+S/LtnhnajbC7szw5tJIZ6/pMWbYZ6hlYBtHvUUu3oJwuTtf CDf4yKE3qVpxJz2UoxRra1CtWd7XklRe4FBnkNDqhnBGWC745wY7D4WA36vB21Mxgf mu4IzBUsxVLLcxQAWPkfx2h3cG3tY8Nt6QGi9LhnbfXQQ9Ri8RHJUHffKumWz0lS8U b1wmdKQ+W7sNs4Pj+Y3abyg8Yb2im3tMXr0CEVaQO1YYTPzfsoWqQe6Lnp1wtbABIg a+2Gy9vij0sGl6p6cWSICRkpEFrujahyqEN2kD3TVdt5lGLoel2SZkhdkrYiQMo6Wq bPPZPqfUV3Tqw== In-Reply-To: <87msmtxkpy.fsf@gmail.com> Feedback-ID: 112775352:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 2dda3bd8a92fddb3255ec03a8bfc4a3298ebb74f Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.16; envelope-from=pipcet@protonmail.com; helo=mail-4316.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 12:03:49 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:321504 Archived-At: On Sunday, July 7th, 2024 at 15:52, Helmut Eller w= rote: > On Sun, Jul 07 2024, Gerd M=C3=B6llmann wrote: >=20 > > > > Oh, I think I found something! "messages" is a let-bound variable > > > > containing all messages. The backtrace goes there. But the backtrac= e > > > > also prints the values of let-bound variables in closures, so it'll > > > > print all messages recursively, giving us O(N^2) behavior at least.= .. > > >=20 > > > Hm, messages is let-bound in ert-test-run-tests-batch-expensive. How > > > can it have any effect or be effected by other tests? > >=20 > > I thought it maybe comes from here > >=20 > > (defun ert-run-tests (selector listener &optional interactively) > > "Run the tests specified by SELECTOR, sending progress updates to LISTE= NER." > > (let* ((tests (ert-select-tests selector t)) > > (stats (ert--make-stats tests selector))) > >=20 > > Haven't checked that though, the lines were too long for me. >=20 >=20 > You mean "stats", which includes results and possibly big objects of the > previous tests, is included in the backtrace. And > ert-test-run-tests-batch-expensive prints it with altered printer > settings. Could be. So (cl-defmethod cl-print-object ((object ert--stats) stream)) should help? It appears to...