From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?B?SvxyZ2VuIEhhcnRtYW5u?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: RE: ispell-buffer skips repetitive suspects after the first is accepted Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 11:08:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: , <837fskqvsr.fsf@gnu.org>, NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1431248960 20158 80.91.229.3 (10 May 2015 09:09:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 09:09:20 +0000 (UTC) To: "help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 10 11:09:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YrNEV-0004zk-T1 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 11:09:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33055 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrNEU-0002Sh-U0 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 05:09:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53101) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrNEK-0002SQ-UK for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 05:09:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrNEH-0007sz-PH for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 05:09:00 -0400 Original-Received: from dub004-omc4s18.hotmail.com ([157.55.2.93]:56372) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrNEH-0007ss-JZ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 05:08:57 -0400 Original-Received: from DUB124-W52 ([157.55.2.71]) by DUB004-OMC4S18.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Sun, 10 May 2015 02:08:56 -0700 X-TMN: [WH5S9HlqshlQP9jeSekXWuKxbFCb9EFN] X-Originating-Email: [juergen_hartmann_@hotmail.com] Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2015 09:08:56.0832 (UTC) FILETIME=[F1E4F800:01D08B00] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 7 or 8 [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 157.55.2.93 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:104350 Archived-At: Francis Belliveau=2C thank you for your answer:=0A= =0A= > This is clearly an intended feature. I am personally annoyed by the inabi= lity=0A= > to indicate something suspicious is valid for a particular document. I do= not=0A= > want such things added to my dictionary because they are likely not valid= for=0A= > other documents.=0A= =0A= I understand what you mean=2C but this is a different point: My concern add= resses=0A= the behavior of ispell-buffer to apply the acceptance of a suspicious=0A= spelling by not only on that particular instance but on all instances= =0A= of that spelling on the respective line.=0A= =0A= Juergen=0A= =0A= =