From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?B?SvxyZ2VuIEhhcnRtYW5u?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: RE: ispell-buffer skips repetitive suspects after the first is accepted Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 11:23:37 +0200 Message-ID: References: , <837fskqvsr.fsf@gnu.org>, , <83vbg3pqbh.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1431249839 578 80.91.229.3 (10 May 2015 09:23:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 09:23:59 +0000 (UTC) To: "help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 10 11:23:52 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YrNSi-0000y8-0j for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 11:23:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33089 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrNSh-000491-6n for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 05:23:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54429) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrNSW-00048j-Vx for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 05:23:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrNST-00032f-QF for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 05:23:40 -0400 Original-Received: from dub004-omc4s5.hotmail.com ([157.55.2.80]:64317) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrNST-00032a-Kp for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 05:23:37 -0400 Original-Received: from DUB124-W29 ([157.55.2.73]) by DUB004-OMC4S5.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Sun, 10 May 2015 02:23:36 -0700 X-TMN: [5doQfNcbV3dbCiP157vnxRdVQV2kF1tM] X-Originating-Email: [juergen_hartmann_@hotmail.com] Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <83vbg3pqbh.fsf@gnu.org> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2015 09:23:36.0932 (UTC) FILETIME=[FE799240:01D08B02] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 7 or 8 [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 157.55.2.80 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:104351 Archived-At: Thank you=2C Eli Zaretskii=2C for the clarification:=0A= =0A= >> From: Francis Belliveau =0A= >> Date: Thu=2C 7 May 2015 19:01:06 -0400=0A= >>=0A= >> This is clearly an intended feature. I am personally annoyed by the=0A= >> inability to indicate something suspicious is valid for a particular=0A= >> document.=0A= >=0A= > This "feature" doesn't do what you want: if the same word happens on=0A= > another line=2C it will be flagged again.=A0 Only words on the same line= =0A= > are exempt.=0A= =0A= @ Eli Zaretskii=2C you got exactly my point. It is not about local dictiona= ries=0A= or document specific spelling--this is a different issue--but about the fac= t=0A= that accepts a spelling for the whole line instead of accepting it fo= r=0A= one particular instance only.=0A= =0A= Juergen=0A= =0A= =