From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?Windows-1252?B?SvxyZ2VuIEhhcnRtYW5u?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: RE: ispell-buffer skips repetitive suspects after the first is accepted Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 11:22:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: , <837fskqvsr.fsf@gnu.org>, , <83vbg3pqbh.fsf@gnu.org>, , <33612209-092D-4B13-AE1F-E2180795281E@comcast.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1431508974 1127 80.91.229.3 (13 May 2015 09:22:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:22:54 +0000 (UTC) To: "help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 13 11:22:46 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YsSsH-00008W-Rr for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 May 2015 11:22:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47443 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YsSsH-0000CN-29 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 May 2015 05:22:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54018) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YsSrn-0008W5-Pn for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2015 05:22:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YsSrl-0007VL-07 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2015 05:22:15 -0400 Original-Received: from dub004-omc4s22.hotmail.com ([157.55.2.97]:51776) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YsSrk-0007V5-OT for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2015 05:22:12 -0400 Original-Received: from DUB124-W27 ([157.55.2.71]) by DUB004-OMC4S22.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Wed, 13 May 2015 02:22:11 -0700 X-TMN: [yjVpJFTpnJqVS26zibAsIyw52Jesmg1j] X-Originating-Email: [juergen_hartmann_@hotmail.com] Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <33612209-092D-4B13-AE1F-E2180795281E@comcast.net> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 May 2015 09:22:11.0239 (UTC) FILETIME=[4AA31B70:01D08D5E] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 7 or 8 [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 157.55.2.97 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:104438 Archived-At: Francis Belliveau wrote:=0A= =0A= > Ok Juergen=2C I see the difference. It is a nuance that I missed since I = have=0A= > never used ispell.=0A= >=0A= > However=2C I still stand on the fact that if the original programmer thou= ght=0A= > this a useful feature=2C then it should remain available. I acknowledge t= hat=0A= > you think that it is a bad feature=2C therefore and option should be avai= lable=0A= > for users to choose which action they feel appropriate/=0A= >=0A= > I know that in general these types of options can get very prolific. Howe= ver=2C=0A= > with proper choice of default behavior=2C few will have the need to deal = with=0A= > them. Also=2C with proper documentation of options=2C those that do=92t l= ike a=0A= > behavior can get what they want also.=0A= =0A= I totally agree with you: If this is an advantageous feature or--to state i= t=0A= more cautious--a property that others may rely on=2C it should never be=0A= dropped=2C of course.=0A= =0A= The question is now=2C whether we face something that is worthy of preserva= tion=0A= here. That's why I formulated the bug report more like "there is something = we=0A= don't understand" instead of "please remove that mistake". See=0A= =0A= http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2015-05/msg00326.html=0A= =0A= Juergen=0A= =0A= =