From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?B?SvxyZ2VuIEhhcnRtYW5u?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: RE: Differences between identical strings in Emacs lisp Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 15:44:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: , , , NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1428500707 3768 80.91.229.3 (8 Apr 2015 13:45:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 13:45:07 +0000 (UTC) To: "help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 08 15:44:58 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YfqHp-00037y-8l for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 15:44:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52855 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YfqHo-00006f-8b for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 09:44:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YfqHV-00005t-Fj for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 09:44:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YfqHG-0002fI-JJ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 09:44:37 -0400 Original-Received: from dub004-omc4s8.hotmail.com ([157.55.2.83]:58796) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YfqHG-0002ey-Bb for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 09:44:22 -0400 Original-Received: from DUB124-W18 ([157.55.2.73]) by DUB004-OMC4S8.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Wed, 8 Apr 2015 06:44:21 -0700 X-TMN: [epgvcPqaoMM40eqSekl2wnIglUnQxvop] X-Originating-Email: [juergen_hartmann_@hotmail.com] Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Apr 2015 13:44:21.0396 (UTC) FILETIME=[1E155540:01D07202] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 7 or 8 [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 157.55.2.83 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:103575 Archived-At: Argh! Writing about it=2C I did the same mistake again.=0A= =0A= Please forget the wrong example in my previous post:=0A= =0A= > Because of the latter we have equality for example=0A= > between "\xBA" and (concat '(#x3FFFBA)):=0A= >=0A= >=A0=A0=A0 (string=3D "\xBA" (concat '(#x3FFFBA)))=0A= >=A0=A0=A0 --> t=0A= =0A= Of course "\xBA" and "\x3FFFBA" represent the same raw byte \272 and both i= n=0A= an unibyte string. Therefore they are trivially equal.=0A= =0A= And what makes it even more embarrassing: I already wrote it right in anoth= er=0A= post before.=0A= =0A= Sorry.=0A= =0A= Juergen=0A= =0A= =