From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: RE: Info-clone-buffer-hook should be renamed Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 15:03:16 -0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1196982250 10632 80.91.229.12 (6 Dec 2007 23:04:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 23:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bug-Gnu-Emacs To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 07 00:04:18 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J0PlQ-0002yD-64 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:04:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0Pl9-0000Jy-9R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:03:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J0Pl3-0000Hq-7P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:03:53 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J0Pkz-0000ER-H9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:03:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0Pky-0000EE-TQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:03:49 -0500 Original-Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J0Pkx-0003X6-O4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:03:48 -0500 Original-Received: from rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (rgmgw1.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.110]) by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id lB6N3aSG022487; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 17:03:37 -0600 Original-Received: from rcsmt251.oracle.com (rcsmt251.oracle.com [148.87.90.196]) by rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.2.4) with ESMTP id lB6MP14b006187; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:03:32 -0700 Original-Received: from dhcp-4op11-4op12-west-130-35-178-158.us.oracle.com by acsmt350.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3412561951196982182; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:03:02 -0800 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:17138 Archived-At: > > It's OK if the function name says to do something with a hook=20 > > (e.g. `add-hook', `mmm-run-major-mode-hook'), but I don't see it=20 > > as appropriate for many of those you cited. Just one opinion, of > > course. >=20 > My point is that using -hook for functions, and specifically for > functions intended to be added to a hook, is a long-standing > convention. We agree that there are a lot of them and those names are not new. That = doesn't make it a convention. And it doesn't make it good. Anyway, as I = say: just one opinion.