From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: should search ring contain duplicates? Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 07:40:38 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87u087nqeo.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146667321 12347 80.91.229.2 (3 May 2006 14:42:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 14:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 03 16:41:57 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FbIXg-0005Di-Ve for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 May 2006 16:41:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FbIXg-0007EH-IC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 May 2006 10:41:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FbIX2-000724-MG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2006 10:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FbIX0-000714-QN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2006 10:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FbIX0-00070x-L8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2006 10:40:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [141.146.126.228] (helo=agminet01.oracle.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.52) id 1FbIXP-0004VB-8r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2006 10:41:11 -0400 Original-Received: from rgmsgw300.us.oracle.com (rgmsgw300.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.49]) by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k43Eeihh020822 for ; Wed, 3 May 2006 09:40:44 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap (dhcp-amer-csvpn-gw2-141-144-75-63.vpn.oracle.com [141.144.75.63]) by rgmsgw300.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with SMTP id k43Eeh9v010551 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 May 2006 08:40:44 -0600 Original-To: "Emacs-Devel" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <87u087nqeo.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Importance: Normal X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53852 Archived-At: BTW, is there any reason why history-delete-duplicates defaults to nil? I agree it should be t. I didn't even realize that variable existed when I started this thread, which is why I asked - why not (always) remove duplicates? I still wonder what the nil use case is - why would anyone want to keep duplicates?