> 在 2021年8月19日，上午9:10，Eli Zaretskii 写道： > >  >> >> From: Yuan Fu >> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 08:59:32 -0700 >> Cc: Emacs Devel >> >>>> * Language definitions:: Loading tree-sitter language definitions. >>>> * Using parsers:: Introduction to parsers. >>>> * Accessing nodes:: Accessing syntax nodes. >>>> * Pattern matching:: Pattern matching with query patterns. >>>> * Query syntax:: Introducing pattern matching query syntax. >>>> * Multiple languages:: Parse buffers written in multiple languages. >>>> * API correspondence:: Correspondence between C API and ELisp API. >>>> * Parse a string:: Parse a single string. >>>> >>>> They are all tree-sitter specific. >>> >>> What's wrong with the section names you show above? >> >> Nothing wrong, just that if we want to add manual for other parsing tools, there could be clashes in title: maybe LSP returns syntax nodes, too, but “Accessing nodes” section is all about tree-sitter nodes. But we’ll worry about that later, as you suggested. > > My idea is to put the documentation of other APIs for the same purpose > in the same section, so there shouldn't be a clash, because there > won't be multiple sections describing similar facilities, there will > be just one. Ok > >> Another problem I discovered when writing the manual is that, my explanation of the query syntax is similar to the official documentation of tree-sitter. Will there by copyright concerns? I’ve written the section describing query syntax, and I’ll write another section describing the grammar definition, these two sections will be similar to their tree-sitter official documentation counterparts, because they cover exactly the same thing. > > Well, I can only suggest to use different wording. Since you are > describing Lisp interfaces, some phrases will be different by > necessity, and others because we have a certain style when we describe > APIs (you should be able to pick up that style by looking in the > existing descriptions in the manual). For ELisp functions, definitely, and I wasn’t talking about that part. For query syntax and language definition syntax, because I and tree-sitter doc are talking about the exact same thing, it is harder. I certainly rephrased, and I tried to come up with different examples. I’m just not sure if that is enough (INAL). > >> Perhaps it is best if you can see what I’ve write and compare that with the official documentation. I (force) pushed the latest code to GitHub. I put the manual in parsing.texi. The section describing the query syntax is (elisp)Parsing Program Source > Pattern matching. The official documentation is at https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/using-parsers#pattern-matching-with-queries > > What is the URL for parsing.texi? I don't think I have it. I have it on “ts” branch. https://github.com/casouri/emacs/blob/ts/doc/lispref/parsing.texi Thanks Yuan