From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13041: 24.2; diacritic-fold-search Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 10:00:16 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20121130182205.C722F14B8D@panix1.panix.com><87ip8fjzwn.fsf@gnu.org> <871uf2647i.fsf@mail.jurta.org><50C1C6CC.9020103@gmx.at> <87ehj18l9p.fsf@mail.jurta.org><104BC54C3EC34891820EDBAB804A380E@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355076101 1745 80.91.229.3 (9 Dec 2012 18:01:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 18:01:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: perin@panix.com, 13041@debbugs.gnu.org, perin@acm.org To: "'Stefan Monnier'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 09 19:01:53 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ThlCG-0005Q7-DZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 19:01:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54651 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThlC4-0006L9-1R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:01:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThlC0-0006J2-PN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:01:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThlBz-0005hM-PD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:01:32 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52303) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThlBz-0005hG-LQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:01:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ThlCT-0007kg-Tx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:02:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13041 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13041-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13041.135507606729731 (code B ref 13041); Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13041) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2012 18:01:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34321 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ThlBZ-0007jS-OS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:01:06 -0500 Original-Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:42437) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ThlBW-0007jD-Ol for 13041@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:01:05 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qB9I0St4019746 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 9 Dec 2012 18:00:29 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB9I0Rtv022458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 9 Dec 2012 18:00:27 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt115.oracle.com (abhmt115.oracle.com [141.146.116.67]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qB9I0Qh5024600; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 12:00:27 -0600 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/71.202.147.44) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 10:00:26 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-reply-to: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Thread-Index: Ac3WI8WKg1px29sIQGKesetEr3aYFAAESlug X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:68244 Archived-At: > > The Unicode Regexp spec says that it is best, if possible, > > to let users do either. > > We're talking about the (now misnamed) "diacritic-fold" search. > If the user wants to be more strict, there's always going to be > the "non-diacritic-fold" search. Yes, and? That ignoring of diacritics etc. is essentially what the Unicode Regexp spec refers to as "loose matching", IIUC. And that means "at least the simple, default Unicode case folding." You are considering, among other things, whether `f' should match the ? ligature or whether only `ff' should match it. The standard deals with this question, I believe. (BTW, I cannot actually see that ligature with my mail client. So I copied the char from another mail message and pasted it, above. If that copy+paste didn't work, what I meant was the ligature for ff.)