From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Jan_Dj=C3=A4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Update on the Emacs release schedule? Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 21:13:39 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87vcookmxd.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325967241 31245 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2012 20:14:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 20:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , Stefan Monnier , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Carsten Mattner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 07 21:13:57 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RjceI-00028J-1U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 21:13:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38452 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjceH-0006gN-8P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:13:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40231) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjceE-0006g5-8O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:13:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjceD-0002Bl-DK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:13:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout.melmac.se ([62.20.26.67]:56129) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjceD-0002BY-3n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:13:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mail01.melmac.se (mail01.melmac.se [62.20.26.80]) by mailout.melmac.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F629DAE for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 21:13:43 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (qmail 9582 invoked by uid 89); 7 Jan 2012 20:12:37 -0000 Original-Received: from h-46-59-42-18.na.cust.bahnhof.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) (boel.djarv@bdtv.se@46.59.42.18) by mail01.melmac.se with ESMTPA; 7 Jan 2012 20:12:37 -0000 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.248] (janiphone [172.20.199.248]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BDB47FA058; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 21:13:43 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 62.20.26.67 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147457 Archived-At: Hello. 7 jan 2012 kl. 19:32 skrev Carsten Mattner : > On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Stefan Monnier w= rote: >>> For the record, I use a --without-gnutls Emacs while also not >>> using Gnus, and am part of the users seeing the "leaks". >>=20 >> AFAIK you're not seeing leaks, but only excessive memory use (and >> failure to return memory to the system early enough for your taste), >=20 > Maybe :). How do we define "early enough"? Hours or days? Never. AFAIK Osx never gives back memory allocated to the system. That is why changing malloc implementation might be the only solution.=20 Jan D.=