From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] scratch/widen-less a4ba846: Replace prog-widen with consolidating widen calls Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 20:48:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20171129233237.27462.23351@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20171130214621.GA22157@ACM> <27985594-3bb4-ce88-8928-2ccfeac13eae@yandex.ru> <20171201154913.GB3840@ACM> <1e542021-e389-cca4-6acd-349efddb2652@yandex.ru> <20171201223529.GG3840@ACM> <4a94ec5c-efdd-50f1-ff4d-277f5f45c2df@yandex.ru> <83lgil1qme.fsf@gnu.org> <83d13x1j2s.fsf@gnu.org> <34abea95-c7f7-e8fa-8407-8c2fd2a4cfe1@yandex.ru> <83y3mkzw1n.fsf@gnu.org> <83mv2zzv7z.fsf@gnu.org> <83r2saxyj1.fsf@gnu.org> <83efoaxv0c.fsf@gnu.org> <57382399-5efa-655f-e374-fbe1ef9d89aa@yandex.ru> <27732BB8-B3B7-4489-963E-A09333026A8E@gnu.org> <394bc7ba-76d7-229e-c45b-dc1c8bc86b22@yandex.ru> <12a94323-35a2-49e3-30fa-8b4c5042f581@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512507283 31819 195.159.176.226 (5 Dec 2017 20:54:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 20:54:43 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android To: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 05 21:53:31 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eMK9s-0002i2-11 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 21:49:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52029 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eMK9u-0002p6-5I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 15:49:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48307) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eMK9J-0002p0-3U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 15:49:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eMK9F-0006oQ-7q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 15:49:05 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56619) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eMK9F-0006o9-3n; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 15:49:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.12.136.31] (port=50088 helo=[10.208.45.224]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eMK9E-0004VA-1H; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 15:49:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <12a94323-35a2-49e3-30fa-8b4c5042f581@yandex.ru> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220749 Archived-At: On December 5, 2017 6:54:59 PM GMT+00:00, Dmitry Gutov = wrote: > On 12/5/17 7:57 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >=20 > > I posted a more or less complete proposal for how to make the > changes you want without breaking previous facilities=2E If you agree > with that proposal (which IMO makes sense even for master), then most > of the issues you raise disappear=2E If you disagree, please respond to > that message of mine explaining why, and let's discuss that first=2E >=20 > Sorry, is it this message? >=20 > http://lists=2Egnu=2Eorg/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-12/msg00158=2Ehtm= l >=20 > I thought I've addresses every point in there (that I could make sense >=20 > of) in other messages in this thread, but if you prefer, I can respond >=20 > to it directly, to put the critique in one place=2E >=20 > Have you read the following messages, BTW? There were no responses=2E >=20 > http://lists=2Egnu=2Eorg/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-12/msg00169=2Ehtm= l > http://lists=2Egnu=2Eorg/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-12/msg00170=2Ehtm= l Yes, please respond to that message directly so that we could have all the= points together=2E To make myself clear: I'd like to see your changes land in a way that as m= uch as possible doesn't remove prog-indentation-context except where there'= s a clear and present contradiction=2E