From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yuan Fu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tree-sitter api Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:35:32 -0700 Message-ID: References: <9C5A86D6-0E7D-4DDF-B211-278EF9AC7E01@gmail.com> <87a6gq5mxl.fsf@gmail.com> <877dbu5mgj.fsf@gmail.com> <0BB906F7-BD3A-41CC-9783-19AA16934497@gmail.com> <83pmplq9f3.fsf@gnu.org> <5B304D80-2969-4F59-9A90-412D0A284912@gmail.com> <83ilvbpsvl.fsf@gnu.org> <4A6F417A-EF74-40B6-9517-6C0947AB87A6@gmail.com> <83wnjmiork.fsf@gnu.org> <6D1CD758-2C6F-4843-9739-F2A5D5591648@gmail.com> <67183EAB-5D98-4211-B71B-4618D6266A15@gmail.com> <83lews90ft.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9157"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , yoavm448@gmail.com, ubolonton@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 31 18:36:17 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nZxmS-0002Hn-SD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 18:36:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44018 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nZxmR-00061W-EV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 12:36:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47714) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nZxlq-00050Y-DO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 12:35:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d] (port=33437 helo=mail-pf1-x42d.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nZxlo-0005Ez-9m; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 12:35:38 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id b13so151162pfv.0; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:35:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=MfhMGhGz9QWvHLu/sYtjKdvNL+VZ/Ae1e80rXq4G85Q=; b=mFlr367SB7ubZh1QigcEDCIUY/bq3+GreEe/uRADlqSsdXQHMpAuQA5R1b0YX80Yle 2sLRgkvvl8V6GuIFN2vPxBE6wCvi6ZMrJBESEkIc8CN6kmsNrEie3I1rSwvzayXDYi12 dkQCqsJ3YepTxwO3JjEVps9x4km1gJ+bYkon5rzUm1ZL2obQgSrqfrYNC4dWR70dHhLA JzmjESAb+xoymPhRnY85ffRwx9uH6WiRjFX/Faj5CZ2XtfTUqsLdKHPQYrz0RNyrE55K j0WY19SKffnzJZmE7xy6+DI8hoDzX2bph729bj2Kj1mxOu2x1ujYJ/b2DUC3JNgmXRn3 2LPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=MfhMGhGz9QWvHLu/sYtjKdvNL+VZ/Ae1e80rXq4G85Q=; b=FTkzFxjR2EgilWe2knCZJOFhouXEN9hrlYlj7iHaFC5hn8NUWeljCJO9wjnOonv19b uTtuO3weTpAZ+MGfOQIetPqGa7iG015NaDVckMS2E823frGhzMLkPj7Pa09obyqhuGjF rDR0B1V6cUtofJ7b1d1q9nXP/2cK8FDCORwtdbT4U7l2ySZju06Mvmc3wDTeubpSsZg1 Sqhm6daqgLcawkk3dTLL0iEcwI3WkljtCeoZLsGS0ZMTzdpwoNSZf0123dDXH8KTkRLq YtXul1oMKSjs8xn3OXY7Fl2CGx7Ie2Z+y65H14i7W2ISiwGWA4jSjyjUN/vjzx5A47QR NaHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5332iAsJtjnw2VwO7JgyEkOeoatSE9a6liSxfK5YOaYluld4HgUm oz5BdNZs2I0SuqTp5kb5vIOvRvhvLRY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEpHIvIpGvW9VlnPW6G3cnI/Eriw0jfLyGqDQwcwRtm7gJJbI4UtikLp8NjUFDjeGudKcdCg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:af47:0:b0:398:4be1:ce1d with SMTP id s7-20020a63af47000000b003984be1ce1dmr11546831pgo.514.1648744533947; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:35:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from smtpclient.apple ([128.54.26.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p3-20020a056a000b4300b004faee36ea56sm28697282pfo.155.2022.03.31.09.35.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:35:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83lews90ft.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.80.82.1.1) X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d; envelope-from=casouri@gmail.com; helo=mail-pf1-x42d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.659, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:287634 Archived-At: > > If so, I think we should have our own load-path for these > libraries; relying on the standard LD_LIBRARY_PATH etc. is not good > enough (although we should support that as well). I envision that at > least in some cases users will not want to have these libraries in the > public places, or maybe even won't have the requisite access rights to > do so. We should provide Emacs-style alternatives, like some > subdirectory of ~/.emacs.d/ and/or under ${prefix}/lib/ (similar to > *.eln files). Anyone has thoughts on this? Yuan