From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Dyballa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Daemon and client: Only open new frame if there isn't one already? Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:35:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2bdf908c0903121552i28e1da76t8f47975f2ff820ab@mail.gmail.com> <90717509-0527-434D-94F0-5BA9B979FB8F@Web.DE> <2bdf908c0903121644u7e8c01a2nb96d0200c83d2319@mail.gmail.com> <2bdf908c0903130408t23772cfex48b4d1abf2afccb9@mail.gmail.com> <60D55027-1709-437B-A5A1-B24AE9EDB629@Web.DE> <2bdf908c0903130734u17db1aa6oc298dc0b7796cd15@mail.gmail.com> <400378B5-3F25-465B-BE4D-EE1F299FCB85@Web.DE> <87k56tvzss.fsf@tux.homenetwork> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1236983769 31991 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2009 22:36:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 13 23:37:25 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LiG0G-0007PS-7t for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:37:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42940 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LiFyu-000223-EH for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:35:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LiFya-00021h-26 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:35:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LiFyV-00021J-KV for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:35:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43954 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LiFyV-00021G-FL for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:35:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de ([217.72.192.234]:50555) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LiFyU-0008Dy-RI for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:35:31 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp08.web.de (fmsmtp08.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.216]) by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01C5F932DC9; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:35:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [91.35.232.239] (helo=[192.168.1.2]) by smtp08.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (WEB.DE 4.110 #277) id 1LiFyS-00032A-00; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:35:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87k56tvzss.fsf@tux.homenetwork> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) X-Sender: Peter_Dyballa@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/C5HridI55R30okIHro6iSjc6e4cmOZTrZ3Aym f0TxtcnfFl/RxXF9MzId6+3ewKN0Gj0k6c6/LheQNyO4wOvNzl A+ko5ZYFAppbXYtzrl6Q== X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:62891 Archived-At: Am 13.03.2009 um 23:11 schrieb thierry.volpiatto: > So if you launch the first emacs with emacs -Q (without server-start) > and then from it, emacsclient -c -a "", it should start a second emacs > process (emacs --daemon) with an emacsclient linked to it. > (not tested) I won't do it this way, Thierry. Since I usually have more than one =20 Emacs running at the same time I tend to control server business =20 tightly. Anyway, I hope this strange behaviour in daemon mode will be =20 corrected before GNU Emacs 23.1 is released. It's outside one's =20 imagination that an X client will open inside some terminal =20 emulation ... OTOH: a second X11 in my Terminal =96 I should go ahead =20= and patent this before some MS guy does! -- Greetings Pete A common mistake that people make when trying to design something =20 completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete =20 fools.