From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:46:43 -0600 Message-ID: References: <87vb98csu1.fsf@red-bean.com> <87r3jw2mzp.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11429c5e2ae71505244ac3e7 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447278410 28250 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2015 21:46:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:46:50 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs development discussions , Artur Malabarba Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 11 22:46:48 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwdE8-0007wO-8E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:46:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43168 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwdE8-0002FE-IH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:46:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwdE5-0002Es-Fy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:46:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwdE4-0004YZ-KN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:46:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yk0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c07::229]:34961) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwdE4-0004YU-Fp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:46:44 -0500 Original-Received: by ykba77 with SMTP id a77so72820371ykb.2 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:46:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=qaG8rJCg0UImcgjRahlDUOUxUxmF/Sx9P4QhyPQ3zps=; b=tWu1ZRza5d+X9/fB6W3qoHfJIp8HdewdcCl58QZyxEEykWe51bKpPTnmn1HsbpnRET Rok7dFW3SFmqZV4yKn7Ak3UAcxH/pRZlBvQiT8qGlo+Jj/99QAfa5rYol8P8IhH6Si2M nuo9FrQpCRfscIeUWg+A31tjxDqaO1PyaFa4qirQvTpo6sQGWNqmB4QZFIoLiAWNaoOI 5ZNdgOVUwi1M9DTcqIfX6Meb2e0dP3Atr0zVlC9GRor/VZzpRpkhFAZ9FV0Hc/2NxrTo tKr+OpU+Q7N9AvNPM+DyXt2NOuCuwJGC+0KouV1rYWcaZLT+XIwT/TunOO9D5otsQWJh YukA== X-Received: by 10.129.17.214 with SMTP id 205mr13637421ywr.284.1447278404096; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:46:44 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.103.12.2 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:46:43 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.103.12.2 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:46:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: RkCxmu7UfpF0fWlHIcLF5l4gsSE X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c07::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194157 Archived-At: --001a11429c5e2ae71505244ac3e7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Nov 11, 2015 3:36 PM, "John Wiegley" wrote: > > >>>>> Artur Malabarba writes: > > > I=E2=80=99ll fix your =E2=80=9CC-o at start of line=E2=80=9D problem ri= ght away, but, if noone > > opposes, I=E2=80=99d like to maintain the current behaviour when typing= C-o in the > > middle of a line. Is that alright? > > Sounds good to me. +1 here too. You make the fix, Artur, and I'll be happy to add the note to etc/NEWS (unless you beat me to it). Best regards, -K --001a11429c5e2ae71505244ac3e7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov 11, 2015 3:36 PM, "John Wiegley" <jwiegley@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I=E2=80=99ll fix your =E2=80=9CC-o at start of line=E2=80=9D prob= lem right away, but, if noone
> > opposes, I=E2=80=99d like to maintain the current behaviour when = typing C-o in the
> > middle of a line. Is that alright?
>
> Sounds good to me.

+1 here too.=C2=A0 You make the fix, Artur, and I'll be = happy to add the note to etc/NEWS (unless you beat me to it).

Best regards,
-K

--001a11429c5e2ae71505244ac3e7--