From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yuri Khan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (ELPA website design) Re: Emacs logo proposal Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:45:07 +0600 Message-ID: References: <876121mjdw.fsf@petton.fr> <87twpilrls.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445568367 21474 80.91.229.3 (23 Oct 2015 02:46:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 02:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Xue Fuqiao , emacs-devel To: Nicolas Petton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 23 04:45:54 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpSMZ-0002zx-B4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 04:45:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35416 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpSMY-0008UR-B2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 22:45:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpSMD-0008UL-6N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 22:45:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpSMC-0008Gx-2e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 22:45:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]:36737) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpSMB-0008Gr-TO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 22:45:27 -0400 Original-Received: by obcqt19 with SMTP id qt19so83338427obc.3 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 19:45:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YVpm5J5MZd6NESfBBhWgKvlf0ip5Jy1p7d16HhCRNWI=; b=irfjciAlmh12Gcu7L6xIzAj6EkBin/btiJfw3Qi3J5ECedcidPA5tMoeAoHrjdfCEG nYXCWbesxvxDaz4oT+3/79/ZUHHtP0llXHqw6fbD2lb7j6AphiEzVcmP45amsuf4/+vS C15Hjaty3vJxHaNXigum5VuuZ4ewFY3QZ1TLsmbLmtC2lgNVKcBnXwBg7RgUsWc6Mej/ M461+yFGu4uB83gt1XWtjZaqqTxNS1ls4+rsrG3kRkVAD5cBRH1IWP7/ToWxjP48nH7C bfDOQdQ4EzFiSJLS302UZCCDpSufb7zxn/J4u0E18yi+b9OnLEbYuM+3F19FjSQ39Gua 52Mw== X-Received: by 10.60.134.133 with SMTP id pk5mr811594oeb.67.1445568327316; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 19:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.202.57.215 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 19:45:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87twpilrls.fsf@petton.fr> X-Google-Sender-Auth: MGPNG48edTn9g6cSLmuQEJy58nA X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192446 Archived-At: On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Nicolas Petton wrote: > I just put a first draft of my work on the GNU ELPA online at > http://nicolas-petton.fr/ressources/elpa/ I=E2=80=99d like to voice my concern with this fragment of CSS: =3D=3D=3D layout.css#line=3D97,102 .container { padding: 80px; width: 960px; margin: 0 auto; } =3D=3D=3D This causes the width of the page to be at least 80+960+80 =3D 1020 pixels, leading to horizontal scrolling on narrower displays. An important case of a narrow display occurs when two windows are tiled side-by-side on a typical 24=E2=80=B3 1920=C3=971080 or 1920=C3=97120= 0 desktop monitor. (This size and resolution is when it becomes really inconvenient to keep the browser maximized to the whole screen, as lines become too wide to read.) Consider also mobile users, whose typical screen width is likely to be just about 2.5=E2=80=B3, or 240 CSS pixels if taken at face value. > It's of course rather unfinished, but gives a taste of where I'm > heading.