From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Yuri Khan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: hebrew: bold face odd when using the monospace font. Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:33:27 +0600 Message-ID: References: <8737mcqtz6.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87h9arxggi.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <874m6qxved.fsf@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471336549 5173 195.159.176.226 (16 Aug 2016 08:35:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:35:49 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 16 10:35:45 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZZqb-0000nA-0q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:35:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40752 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZZqS-0004U8-PF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 04:35:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47579) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZZok-0003Tv-RP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 04:33:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZZoj-0008E1-Qq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 04:33:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]:34688) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZZoj-0008DY-KW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 04:33:49 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id q128so26994414wma.1 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 01:33:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=REEJmPuDBUGxqNe7/BK70jYU5xz7UjeFXK0L3xEoSK4=; b=Y6xmFiFEAAigvDik5EvS3RUoPxSRfnFktV2FDAUjJfkl9107ZlUILaa32v/RPxsJdC YSSo3DYwOmotq39wj7jlLancfnw1pwrixOfFvuc5DFekV+QmM+ST4qRHcC/J15JL5sHr ebsLkIRGhHA+At6d3QmXofAgsRKKf+bdHV43HdJzbrSY0J+OZUSowSZFKZ4CWhht0Exy 7Rm0g1pssGIz+LdjiLT9QNA5ANXptq1AvhNj1bWkj+LJC1IhGyQiVHTpm1F27cv5QhZP C2vLnUVIfxMHMs3Skx+tasnZvshswck+xhUXqMqUl16ouA5YWGR88/Q8HB4b5ABecBEO TFaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=REEJmPuDBUGxqNe7/BK70jYU5xz7UjeFXK0L3xEoSK4=; b=XISMFC7UixroozqGjRCGeE93X7CvaomnOtfuUHeWXEfk/7W4L/+hJvBnvVuc5/dwaZ qF79oKX+rvHp9247SKyro1Pb6l7bNl+evc/0g0kDg1pn5MpNZJkO7j/KxIfVG0JrFBnv Q+MK+OBiXPENGf3skpMgI3SnyMD9xS0TxPkqu2hCYCb07UDqCmWG/M/LDAdWP5xAS1El SxINN3mZrlwnGUCPAeL1qXfEvP5jhdeLkwPj6m3eeuS4EaUbwyJopAouEtCaHXJazcl+ aeQzYwo4lQNI664WiUefUGXd6Im3pbuUmqIRMIspoaCYCJB55BBOvoW3F28IZZQr9/q1 Bugw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoout3rajIMUvZ/0DhEWp3v/VHOmQYVW5ZjbGoePbWFRsUIRhNrmH5tUwTydDF/pECVde/vAJ3tYwSzmTWQA== X-Received: by 10.46.33.8 with SMTP id h8mr5577162ljh.36.1471336428341; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 01:33:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.81.40 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 01:33:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874m6qxved.fsf@mat.ucm.es> X-Google-Sender-Auth: kqSAMSGNg3RCaU94LsXB1xfn-V4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206612 Archived-At: On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Uwe Brauer wrote: > > So here you are: you get DejaVu Sans, not DejaVu Sans Mono, for Hebr= ew. > > Yep but strangely enough for no hebrew I obtain > > ,---- > | character: A (displayed as A) (codepoint 65, #o101, #x41) > | display: by this font (glyph code) > | xft:-unknown-DejaVu Sans Mono-normal-normal-normal-*-19-*-*-*-m-0-i= so10646-1 (#x24) > `---- Nothing strange here: DejaVu Sans Mono *does* cover Latin, so when you ask for DejaVu Sans Mono, you get what you ask for. On the other hand, with Hebrew, you ask for DejaVu Sans Mono, you get another font that covers Hebrew. (The alternative would be that you get exactly what you ask for and any characters that the font does not cover would be displayed as empty squares, =EF=BF=BD replacement characters= or other unintelligible things.)