From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yuri Khan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Gnu Elpa: stream.el: Add some more basic stream operations Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 22:13:32 +0600 Message-ID: References: <87twhbmwbx.fsf@web.de> <878tynl720.fsf@petton.fr> <8737onlapw.fsf@web.de> <87ziqu7ew9.fsf@petton.fr> <87mvmuxuyo.fsf@web.de> <8760tixi99.fsf@web.de> <87twh1kpem.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1465575313 17651 80.91.229.3 (10 Jun 2016 16:15:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nicolas Petton , Emacs developers To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 10 18:15:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bBP5S-00019t-Sa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 18:15:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43213 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBP5S-0005J4-3x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:15:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35157) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBP4E-0005Gq-NJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:13:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBP4D-0003wt-Mk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:13:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x242.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::242]:34443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBP4D-0003wg-Ev for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:13:53 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id k192so6477840lfb.1 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:13:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=vyLvT7gnlFtCtRhhbBATORJt8KJFSeHXlAkZXIDDlhA=; b=Ll9YvesibsRgi9bW06n2kK9O8z/SCKmSv7S4QVC7Mv1M8o+p7OoqGBdFVGDyao5JmE 67SLbRERW0Y6dDHu9u09TNZOx0a9gVxWtiD1b7vIMOCoj9iY2L+XMCyXOz3L0yru/pQH 04m2jopgvw+aFOV7tmTlhMcH/A45hQBD+20DxwwsQy9OIEVEzEuJTKDxJCwd9unFRRj7 dWFQ3NXYShWGCgYwpgUM6O5KD/vW5E/E5UOCyS+8RgX5tlRuKe4xvMQnwxra4wFB+gwX rT57TA/hUoXIZZOLApFupOJAWJyZOXT6UAh9ZNIIwLLKoeyPUUc506vdWCzSUneVRPbn Jx3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vyLvT7gnlFtCtRhhbBATORJt8KJFSeHXlAkZXIDDlhA=; b=a3XSOGnxpbIfW50gMfHr3cBfu+O+roWvBDOMfjHmxe2oa0lSTp/bTbQy4qdAhTUohT 9Bp0o0lbsn+8afyH/MKLOeKn2y5SbyCnPzRWJ+Oj6AbdNjUM7SsZMY2RJrZCKKJZ4PsD 7NlwEaOqMbPSjVrz5enT+Y3Bpl3O7ShpEsS4/kKNELsaYZ77o1K6WxBIBKopeIzwpJgb fizik4F/Gwv42TL+bBOnMeRP/mec21VBusdASfpoPUzg+Os+E2EK1KwT9r7vGcvlhOmW OwlLRN/1G+6WMmKmg6TbW9mjdnuJeSOAKV7WnwTiOWEjNP5mWKtnxCe9Ai6zJ8w1DLlD mS2w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLanBriCsbrNwssQlrUYUD1Rw5BqOd7gcJz4fQLsSyNJYGzbwNuax81T16GedCkw0uqezqSQ/1gQMDzMA== X-Received: by 10.46.33.15 with SMTP id h15mr853231ljh.36.1465575232644; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:13:52 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.182.167 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:13:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87twh1kpem.fsf@web.de> X-Google-Sender-Auth: zpDTgbqlAgQNNXlmF_KszTqUO2s X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::242 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204277 Archived-At: On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Michael Heerdegen wrote: > Would it make sense to add an `seq-take-until' for convenience? seq-take-until might be a fitting addition to seq-take-while. seq-drop-until, for completeness?