From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yuri Khan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 71783e9: Add the string-numeric-lessp function Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:35:29 +0600 Message-ID: References: <20160221043348.25201.81719@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87twl2fzaw.fsf@gnus.org> <87oabafwv5.fsf@gnus.org> <87twl2e5ys.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456083385 7658 80.91.229.3 (21 Feb 2016 19:36:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 19:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" , Stephan Mueller To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 21 20:36:23 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aXZnn-0008JM-Mf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 20:36:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43596 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXZnn-0002Vd-2p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 14:36:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49419) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXZnP-0002Pq-Bw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 14:36:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXZnK-0005te-9H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 14:35:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b]:34369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXZnK-0005tR-15 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 14:35:50 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id j78so81830372lfb.1 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:35:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=GPTzyHLZdpewh01W6N1Af+kO4Ijt+9BlM3blO66WDzg=; b=hsrf/Xuz/dkbS3qe2tKrszPJnIB8KwRIDCmKd7onBzult3pHwRPuZjrQHrKgSevbeO aykDYirRU02j5+4rXdkQoanl7UKJyN+mbGCZr24irTfbIUnTJ0/wXe504vDAxw2N9P8G nR9aai8wSk04DLm6qY+XkjBv5TSnxxwNvPyZcWIrAeqReo285/friZQO5Rl8TaRxrru4 MQnRvVwjFtJdgOaOZC3tCfrX2YuX/34HZPfPHc4GhR0c66yUhGts3I+o91eVnMWYGAx6 nx0xR+9HqT0WfYZV3hMFeH1GP32zXTjYWYWb8fhoysPJ755iYdgrQOuMt2TlQxpVoL9X oXwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=GPTzyHLZdpewh01W6N1Af+kO4Ijt+9BlM3blO66WDzg=; b=A0dedF1V4gzqbYMKRTrBtUasTU2SMLTlL+RgD5Td12YoTHb8+S4te/K2n6WjKQBNSa rw08gX529I/2lP0O649PbouyzzetLthWlc5HonOJs28tbkE44qTtDGwP5EFPYhi4PL9S oTO/bIgnhOYGTfbHHdTe3JD6vT7CoN94MDOF9BvlFD4QVxu4Lpzogk2EVzbCDZfz5oVG zZB50wrcjMzqnAD4ss7c5LrKwIKWFp0WrulrgixkwqXmLe8YUoK+o1jmTbl8Q15v1mkQ Ci4YSQpXCnswVujpkYkS5C4LzL9LiM8oW7w/eEcLDho1U+gUokTYdbHn1eWzeGByKM9P ZBRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORJcnCqYNEuaYwXwjeY7Ihw+5eSE2k+mWlR99D1TjpJ/Yimbu38Y3P4s1AhPvUnm23Gi0cpHsQ7Qs5xqA== X-Received: by 10.25.165.133 with SMTP id o127mr8845086lfe.105.1456083348985; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:35:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.239.42 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:35:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87twl2e5ys.fsf@gnus.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: DgZTtBia9dK9eOQNsOUjrF-aTas X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:200400 Archived-At: On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Oh, that's true... it should skip leading zeroes. Skipping zeroes will make strings that differ only in the number of leading zeros (e.g. 001 and 01) equivalent under that sorting order. Are you okay with that?